Global Warming Conspiracy Exposed

by Jesse Ventura

Jesse, thank you very much for doing this. - Ed

Thousands of scientists agree that global warming is a scientific fraud. It is easy to prove global warming is false by using the scientific method. The model predictions do not fit the data, therefore the hypothesis is wrong. As Feynman said, it does not matter who you are (even if you are the UN IPCC), if your prediction does not match the data then your hypothesis is wrong! Climate Gate has shown it to be far worse: they manipulated the data. That's fraud and conspiracy.

Consider Jesse Ventura's video as an counter hypothesis, a political hypothesis, to explain global warming. From it we can make certain predictions, like climategate, massive media money to brainwash citizens, fraudulent school books, forcing kids to watch Gore's movie, and even pushing a "solution" that is far worse than the claimed problem. These predictions are supported by the data. - Ed

Here is Jesse's movie, all four parts in one.

For the latest News about your Freedom, read Dr. Jack Schmitt's news releases here.

Climatologist Dr. Tim Ball comments on hacked CRU emails:

"Emails prove AGW (human-caused global warming) is a deliberate fraud!"

How a computer hacker saved America: Give him a Nobel Peace Prize!

A musical view of Michael Mann's Hockey Stick Temperature Fraud

Lord Christopher Monckton exposes the true goal of the Global Warmers:

Marxist World Government and the end of American sovereignty

"Thank you America, you were the beacon of freedom for the world. ... But in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy and your prosperity away forever. And neither you or any ... government will have any power whatsoever to take it back again. That is how serious it is.

"I've read the treaty. ... they are going to sign this treaty whether you like it or not.

"But I think it is here, here in your great nation ... that perhaps, in this eleventh hour, in the 59th minute, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty."

Open Letter to American Physical Society and our Senate by 206 physicists

Open Letter to German Chancellor by 130 scientists

Open Letter to UN IPCC by 101 scientists

I am changing this whole website to WordPress. When this software job is done, I will be back to giving you timely information about important issues on Climate Change. The new site will also allow you to participate in the discussions. We are going to help you organize a community of your friends who are interested in what to do about "Climate Change." - Ed

Welcome to Climate Physics

Here is a website where you can learn about climate change and global warming. Our goal is to give you, the non-specialist, sufficient knowledge for you to draw your own conclusions about global warming.

Most likely, at this point, you do not have the background to make a valid decision. Most likely, you are not a professional atmospheric scientist. You have been literally brainwashed by the media with false alarms. We will show you how to recognize false alarms and to avoid the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent. Unless you understand this fallacy, you will likely reach the wrong conclusion.

We will show you how you do not have to be an expert in atmospheric science in order to know when the hypothesis of global warming is proven to be false.

To develop and test a hypothesis, you must be an expert in the field but you do not need to be an expert to know when a hypothesis has been falsified. What you do need to know are some basics of the philosophy of science.

While I am among the thousands of atmospheric scientists who have concluded that human carbon dioxide is not and cannot cause global warming, we plan to offer you scientific discussions with scientists who take the opposite view from mine.

We intend to keep this site professional. Our discussions of the science of global warming will be kept at the best science level we can produce. We will not allow diversions that include irrelevant personal accusations such as funding, wise cracks or innuendos to enter our discussions of the science. Science is impersonal.

As scientists, our objective is to relentlessly pursue the truth about nature. As individual scientists, sometimes we win and sometimes we lose a scientific argument. Losing is not a disgrace because even a losing argument usually contributes to scientific progress.

Today, this site shows only a hint of what you will see here in a few weeks. We are preparing some very interesting blogs where you will be able to interact, offer your opinions, and ask questions.

Meanwhile, we have some initial material and references that may interest you.