Peer into the mind of a global warming alarmist

They think human carbon dioxide is causing our earth to vibrate, like the picture below, and is about to explode into climate runaway.

They cannot tell the difference between illusion and reality. Like the picture below, their illusion of global warming is in their brains.

We have been conditioned by mass marketing and Pavlov training to believe in global warming. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated ... unless we rely on science to tell us the truth.

The logic of the scientific method that I teach you will save you from the global warming delusion.

But nothing can save you from this delusion. Here is what is happening inside the minds of global warmers:

Climate Malpractice

The following article appeared in the Salt Lake Tribune on May 25, 2009.

I don't practice medicine because I do not have expertise in medicine. But here is a medical doctor who is practicing climate physics ... and it is obvious from what he has written that he has no expertise in climate physics or in the politics of global warming.

And to make it worse, he is preaching his unadulterated nonsense to the general public. He has been brainwashed. His mind is tricking him and he does not know it. In short, the good doctor is guilty of climate malpractice. He should know better.

Not only has he inverted the truth in almost every sentence, he has fallen for the logical error of "affirming the consequent" hook, line and sinker. - Ed

We can no longer ignore science of global disaster

The Salt Lake Tribune

Updated: 05/22/2009 07:10:01 PM MDT

Dr. Brian Moench

Politicians who deny human-caused climate disruption elevate their own opinions above the expertise of not only climate scientists, but biologists, physicists, chemists and ecologists. It's as arrogant and inexplicable as claiming they know more about how to launch rockets than NASA, more about building skyscrapers than architects and more about computers than geeks.

[Dr. Moench has no idea how many top scientists reject global warming. He has not done his homework. He is being arrogant in claiming he knows more about the nature of climate than thousands of climate scientists. He is out of his field of expertise and out of his league. - Ed]

A new report will now force these politicians to conclude they also know more about health and medical science than doctors. Next time they have chest pain we should hand out scalpels and insist they do their own open-heart surgery.

[I don't do open heart surgery. Dr. Moench should likewise not do climate science or advise politicians about climate science. - Ed]

A new report released jointly by the Lancet (the most prestigious medical journal in the United Kingdom) and numerous departments of the University College London outlines anticipated global public health consequences of climate change. The lead author said, "The big message of this report is that climate change is a health issue affecting billions of people, not just an environmental issue about polar bears and deforestation. The impacts will be felt ... in our lifetimes and those of our children."

[The above is entirely bull shit plus he is hiding his assumption that the climate change he is talking about can be controlled by politicians. Who is forecasting what climate change? What is the credibility of the forecast? Where is the connection with humans? Be realistic. If the climate did warm in the UK, it will still not be as warm as more southern climates. Are these southern climates experiencing detrimental health effect because they are warmer? Of course not. Both the Lancet and Dr. Moench are illogical. I thought MDs were supposed to be trained in logic. - Ed]

These public health experts warn of increased transmission of tropical diseases such as malaria, West Nile virus and dengue fever, as well as more frequent killer heat waves like the one in Europe during July 2003 that killed 70,000 people.

[Dr. Moench is making several logical errors. He is assuming the tropical diseases are a function of a fraction of a degree in temperature when there are many other factors that can cause a spread of a disease. He is overlooking the fact that there was a lot more health problems in the Little Ice Age and that people were healthy and happy during the warmer climatic periods. The 2003 heat wave was not associated with global warming. - Ed]

Already more than a billion people suffer malnutrition and inadequate clean water resources. Summer temperatures in Australia and India are expected to exceed 120 degrees. Half the world's population is likely to face severe food shortages from climate disruption. Accessible clean water will be further diminished by disappearing glaciers and the consequences of fatal and debilitating gastrointestinal diseases will spread.

[Balderdash. He has not shown (a) that human CO2 causes any significant global warming, (b) that global warming will result in more malnutrition or less clean water, (c) that human-caused global warming is responsible for disappearing glaciers. He is omitting the facts that food production is more limited by government policies than by climate, and that food distribution is more limited by politics than by the availability of food. Again, his overall premise is that politicians can stop all the problems he lists by passing laws restricting carbon dioxide emissions. He is close to insane. - Ed]

Increases in the frequency and severity of hurricanes, cyclones, fires, floods and droughts will result in frequent public health crises. Large-scale population migration will be inevitable, resulting in civil disorder, if not outright war, as in Sudan.

[He is scientifically wrong in his facts and his forecasts are without any credibility. - Ed]

As people flee areas made uninhabitable by hotter temperatures or destroyed by extreme weather events, they not only place heavy demands on the ecosystems and social infrastructures into which they migrate, but also carry illnesses that emerge from shifts in infectious disease vectors. Think swine flu on steroids.

[His mind is in a make-believe world. There is no basis for his claims. - Ed]

Another recent medical report calculated that the decrease in air pollution from reducing fossil fuel combustion by 50 percent could save 100 million lives by 2050.

[Air pollution is independent from carbon dioxide emissions. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant and has no effect on health. Technology exists for reducing known pollutants from burning fossil fuels. If that were not true then people would be dying like flies in big cities with their traffic jams. - Ed]

No one is faster to the courtroom than Americans when they think they have been harmed by someone else. Yet, many of us are indignant at the suggestion that the American carbon-intensive lifestyle is already responsible for endangering entire nations (Dick Cheney famously said the American lifestyle was non-negotiable). But we are on course to cause unimaginable suffering, disease and loss of life to billions of people in poorer nations, and to future generations everywhere.

[American use of carbon energy sources is not responsible for endangering entire nations. Maybe he is talking about our use of foreign oil. The solution is again political: simply open our oil, coal and forest biomass reserves to the American public. We have all the resources we need. - Ed]

Rationalizing our behavior by claiming that the science isn't in yet is a cowardly response. Add medical science to the other disciplines that no longer allow us that refuge.

[He is crazy. The economics is done. It will cost thousands of times more to stop world carbon emissions than to simply adapt to climate change. He is proposing the economically defunct cautionary principle. - Ed]

If a 2-year-old old runs out in the street, responsible parents don't react when it's convenient, and they don't wait for absolute proof that the child will be killed by a car before they whisk their child from danger.

[Nor do you make government try to solve a problem that does not exist, and which it cannot solve even if it did exist. And before attempting a solution you always look at the human costs of the proposed solution. The truth is that the proposed solution will cause more human misery than doing nothing but adapt if necessary. - Ed]

Waiting until it's economically convenient, or demanding absolute proof that your carbon emissions will kill others before you act, is just as irrational, immoral and indefensible.

[He seems to not understand what "proof" means. The scientific hypothesis of human-caused global warming is already disproven. To continue to believe in it as a matter of public policy amounts to enforcing a religion on the population. It is irrational, immoral and indefensible to restrict cheap energy. Such a policy would impact more on the poor and reduce their already difficult life style to economic slavery. The Dr.'s proposal is unethical. - Ed]

The authors of the Lancet report state, "The inequity of climate change -- with the rich causing most of the problem and the poor initially suffering most of the consequences -- will prove to be a source of historical shame to our generation if nothing is done to address it."

[The proposed solution of making energy more expensive is the ultimate inequity. That is what will prove to be the ultimate shame. Look at the recent example of the damage done by promoting ethanol as an alternative to oil. It raised the cost of food around the world and caused human misery. - Ed]

The Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment found Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. to be a supportive partner. We think he was asked to serve as ambassador to China because he understands climate change, the immorality of carbon emissions from business as usual, and the key role China must play in mitigating the looming global health catastrophe.

[Gov. Huntsman does not understand climate change any more than Dr. Moench understands climate change and the associated morality. - Ed]

Public statements from our soon-to-be governor, Gary Herbert, are cause for concern. We ask him to take a page from Huntsman's playbook. Accepting science has become a moral imperative and the centerpiece of real family values, especially if "family" means the entire human family, and "values" means life itself.

[So now we see what this article is all about. Dr. Moench supports the democratic candidate for governor of Utah. - Ed]

Dr. Brian Moench is president of Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment.