Climate Physics

Here is what the scientists say:

1. 2007: 101 key scientists contradict the IPCC Report. (See their full letter in the menu "GW Letter to IPCC"):

2. 2008: 650 scientists, over 12 times the 52 signers, dissent at the UN meeting.

3. 2008: Japan Geoscience Union symposium survey showed 90% of participants do not believe the IPCC report.

4. 2009: 700 key scientists sign the Senate report (Inhofe) debunking man-made global warming claims. Click Here to Read this Report

5. 2009: International Conf on Climate Change: All 700 scientists agree that CO2 does not cause global warming. (Most of these are not the same 700 as on the list above.)

Here is a summary of #1 above:  

• The IPCC Summary Reports do not represent the input, views or consensus of scientists.

• Claims of global warming are not evidence that the global warming hypothesis is correct.  Changes in glaciers, sea-level, species, etc., are not evidence of abnormal climate change.

• The climate models are invalid. They cannot predict climate and even the IPCC reps agree.

• The global warming hypothesis has been falsified by significant peer-reviewed research.

• There is no basis to cut CO2 emissions. It is not shown that CO2 alters climate and it is not possible to stop climate change

• Cutting CO2 is bad economics, is a tragic misallocation of our resources, will decrease our ability to adapt and will increase human suffering.

• We must produce energy and not limit CO2 emissions. We need energy to adapt to natural climate change. The “precautionary principal” (the idea of spending money to solve a problem that you are not sure exists) is irrational.

This is very strong support from the atmospheric science community for the position that the global warming hypothesis is dead.